Saturday, July 11, 2009

How do atheists account for logic and rationality?

Here are some more explanations of the TAG argument, and addressing some of the common objections. Personally, I have somewhat of a difficult time defending as well as explaining the argument in light of the objections, which is why I haven't really spent too much time arguing these points publicly. However, the explanatory power of the presuppositional approach is still at the top of my list for defending the existence of God. If anyone knows of any serious, published responses to the TAG argument, i'd love to check them out.

Matt slick explains some more tenants of the TAG argument:

at

1 comment:

  1. Anonymous3:30 PM

    Atheist philosopher Michael Martin is the only atheist I know who has taken TAG seriously. You can read a debate he had with John Frame at http://www.reformed.org/apologetics/index.html?mainframe=/apologetics/martin_TAG.html

    Joseph

    ReplyDelete

Blog comment rules and things to consider:

-Realize the fact that you don't run this blog. I do.
-I have zero tolerance for cussing.
-Be mindful of the fact that I can't respond to all comments or engage in endless debates.
-Keep your comments on topic. Otherwise, don't expect a response at all.
-Be respectful and refrain from personal slander and insults.
-All comments become my property once posted; which means they are subject to being posted as a potential blog topic among other things (i.e. YouTube video)