Tuesday, October 12, 2010
Kill the suffering babies
I can sympathize with the speechless, deer-in-the-headlights-looking lady as Virginia Ironside expresses her views on abortion. God help us if this becomes the outspoken view of abortionists worldwide. Of course, we've all heard that unwanted pregnancies are akin to "suffering" on behalf of the mother as well as a "suffering" child who might grow up living in the slums. In both cases, the child is better off dead (according to abortionists). To my utter shock, Ironside takes it a step further and would willingly kill a child outside of the womb. The reason why this is a shock to me is because abortionists typically view children as human when their location is outside of the womb. Of course, this makes no sense, which is why I think Ironside is a consistent abortionist.
This is what materialistic atheism leads to when it becomes consistent. Children, whether inside the womb our outside, are nothing but bags of cells. So why not put a pillow over their face when they have been diagnosed with a disease or mental illness? Why not take it a step further and kill them when they act up in school? Or maybe you lose your job and can no longer afford to feed this bag of cells; so drown it in the bathtub?
How consistent will unbelievers become? I fear it will grow worse as God lifts His hand of restraint from them as they grow in their hatred of their Creator and Lord.
“So this I say, and affirm together with the Lord, that you walk no longer just as the Gentiles also walk, in the futility of their mind, being darkened in their understanding, excluded from the life of God because of the ignorance that is in them, because of the hardness of their heart.” (Ephesians 4:17-18)
“To the pure, all things are pure; but to those who are defiled and unbelieving, nothing is pure, but both the mind and their conscience are defiled.” (Titus 1:15)