Another evangelical apologist advocating belief in the new earth.

Hat tip to Jay Hess for advocating the biblical doctrine of the new earth.  I hope more apologists will stop defending the idea that Christians will spend eternity in heaven, as this is not only unbiblical, but unproductive.  I was also very surprised to see that Charles Stanley, one of the most prominent figures in evangelical circles, defend the doctrine of the new earth.  So much for the belief of many JW's that they are the only ones believe in the new earth.

Who does John 6:68 apply to?

One Watchtower apologist thinks this applies to a non-profit printing organization located in Brooklyn, NY.  This is consistent with what the Watchtower themselves have stated:

*** w92 11/15 p. 21 Serve Jehovah Loyally ***

Nowhere Else to Go

¹² We will be impelled to serve Jehovah loyally with his organization if we remember that there is nowhere else to go for life eternal. When Jesus’ statements caused ‘many disciples to go off to the things behind,’ he asked his apostles: “You do not want to go also, do you?” Peter replied: “Lord, whom shall we go away to? You have sayings of everlasting life; and we have believed and come to know that you are the Holy One of God.”—John 6:66-69.

However, the Scriptures are very clear on who this text is applied to if context means anything:

(John 6:66-71) ⁶⁶ Owing to this many of his disciples went off to the things behind and would no longer walk with him. ⁶⁷ Therefore Jesus said to the twelve: “YOU do not want to go also, do YOU?” ⁶⁸ Simon Peter answered him: “Lord, whom shall we go away to? You have sayings of everlasting life; ⁶⁹ and we have believed and come to know that you are the Holy One of God.” ⁷⁰ Jesus answered them: “I chose YOU twelve, did I not? Yet one of YOU is a slanderer.” ⁷¹ He was, in fact, speaking of Judas [the son] of Simon Is·car′i·ot; for this one was going to betray him, although one of the twelve.

Who did Peter have in mind when he uttered the question, "whom shall we go away to?"  A printing organization that would not arise for another 2,000 years, or Jesus Himself?  

Watchtower apologists, such as StandFirm, want to divert the issue by arguing issues related to ecclesiology and whether Christians should worship God in opposition to those whom Christ Himself appointed as apostles in the first century.  But even if the Governing Body are who they claim to be, John 6:68 is contextually applicable only to Jesus.  To apply it to seven fallible and error-prone men in Brooklyn, NY is nothing short of blasphemous.  So why do Watchtower apologists defend the Watchtower such embarrassingly poor arguments like these?  Because they must have absolute unquestionable submission to whatever is put in print by the Watchtower.  

But I didn't write this blog necessarily to refute one of the extremely few Watchtower apologists who write and dialogue on the internet; its to offer an argument that could prove useful for anyone who wishes to witness to a JW. Consider using John 6:68 in asking a JW who this text is applied to in context.  This question alone could prove effecting in getting JW's to "examine the Scriptures to see if these things are so." (Acts 17:11)  

My second appearance on the Theopologetics podcast discussing the JW's "two-class" theology.

From the Theopologetics website:

Episode 50 of the Theopologetics Podcast is now available! Mike Felker from The Apologetic Front joins me once again to discuss the Jehovah's Witnesses, this time focusing in particular on their "two-class" doctrine of life in the eternal state. This episode contains part 1 of the interview; see episode 51, "144,000," for part 2.

Two JW elders confronted

In this video, an atheist confronts two JW elders regarding the so-called "secret elder's manual."  If you want to know the background about this manual (the newest was recently released), a simple google search of "Watchtower elder's manual" should bring up some hits, as well as the option to download (do so at your own risk).  Or you could ask a JW in your local area, but you may get a blank stare.

I'm not advocating the atheist's approach, nor am I drawing a conclusion from this video.  I post it here for two reasons:

1. A video confrontation like this is extremely rare and i'm surprised these elders agreed to it.

2. For educational purposes.  Watch the full video and draw your own conclusions in the matter.

However you look at it, this was a very interesting encounter to say the least.  If these elders agreed to do an interview regarding this issue, I would very much enjoy the same 15 minutes to confront them about the Watchtower's "two-class theology."  If anyone has any ideas as to how I could approach some JW's regarding such an opportunity, please share your ideas.  I have no intention of embarrassing any JW, but to video-tape an interview whereby the viewer can listen to both sides interact and come to their own conclusions on the matter.

Response to a Jehovah's Witness

Below is my video response to THIS VIDEO from a JW on YouTube.  If anyone is interested in aspects relating to the Watchtower's two-class theology, I think you'll enjoy this:

My Interview with Apologetics315 on Jehovah's Witnesses

Thank you, Brian, for the opportunity for this interview!  Here's the description from APOLOGETICS315:

Today's interview is with Mike Felker. Mike blogs on apologetics at TheApologeticFront, with an emphasis on interacting with Jehovah's Witnesses. He talks about his background, the overall belief system of JWs, The Watchtower Society, their various teachings regarding salvation, the afterlife, Jesus, the trinity, etc. He also discusses strategies for interaction including what to focus on and what to avoid. You might also enjoy Mike's interview on the Theopologetics podcast at this link. Mike's video channels on Youtube are here and here.

Full Interview MP3 Audio here (1hr)

Enjoy.

Books recommended by Mike for dealing with Jehovah's Witnesses:

• Jehovah's Witnesses Answered Verse by Verse
• Crisis of Conscience
• Tactics

Subscribe to the Apologetics 315 Interviews podcast here or in iTunes.

Not measurable and numbered...yet measurable and numbered

(Revelation 7:4) 4 And I heard the number of those who were sealed, a hundred and forty-four thousand, sealed out of every tribe of the sons of Israel:

According to the Watchtower, the 144,000 are a literal group of "anointed" Christians who will go to heaven to rule and reign with Christ.  They believe that the rest of the true Christians are described as follows:

(Revelation 7:9) 9 After these things I saw, and, look! a great crowd, which no man was able to number, out of all nations and tribes and peoples and tongues, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, dressed in white robes; and there were palm branches in their hands. 

In addition, the Watchtower believes this "great crowd" is so large that its not able to be numbered.  And they do so on the basis of what the text actually says: "which no man was able to number."

Since the Watchtower holds to the innumerable nature of the great crowd on the basis of such descriptive terms, it is interesting how another text uses similar language:

(Hosea 1:10) 10 “And the number of the sons of Israel must become like the grains of the sand of the sea that cannot be measured or numbered. And it must occur that in the place in which it used to be said to them, ‘YOU men are not my people,’ it will be said to them, ‘The sons of the living God.’

It is beyond dispute that though the Watchtower views an historical fulfillment of this text in 537 B.C.E. in the exile from Babylon, they also view an additional fulfillment in the establishment of the "anointed class" of 144,000.  The reason we know this is because this text is quoted and applied in 1 Peter 2:10 and Romans 9:26; two texts interpreted by the Watchtower in reference to the "anointed class."

*** w10 3/15 p. 24 pars. 3-4 One Flock, One Shepherd ***

³ The apostle Peter clearly identified this new nation. He wrote the following to his fellow Christians: “You are ‘a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for special possession, that you should declare abroad the excellencies’ of the one that called you out of darkness into his wonderful light.” (1 Pet. 2:9) As foretold, natural Jews who accepted Jesus as the Messiah were the first members of that new nation. (Dan. 9:27a; Matt. 10:6) Later, many non-Israelites were also included in this nation, for Peter went on to say: “You were once not a people, but are now God’s people.”—1 Pet. 2:10.

⁴ To whom was Peter here speaking? In the beginning of his letter, he says: “[God] gave us a new birth to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to an incorruptible and undefiled and unfading inheritance. It is reserved in the heavens for you.” (1 Pet. 1:3, 4) So this new nation is made up of anointed Christians, who have the heavenly hope. They are “the Israel of God.” (Gal. 6:16) In a vision, the apostle John saw that these spiritual Israelites number 144,000

Consider the dilemma for the Watchtower.  Revelation 7:9 is interpreted as an innumerable group on the basis of the words, "which no man was able to number."  Yet, Hosea 1:10 is also in reference to a group "that cannot be measured or numbered."  Yet, the Watchtower believes that this group is numbered and quite small compared to the "great crowd."

This problem can be summarized as follows:

• The "anointed" class in literal and numbered (Rev. 7:4), yet they are so large that they cannot be numbered (Hos. 1:10). 

• The "great crowd" is not numbered since they are "not able to be numbered." (Rev. 7:9)
  
  

Do all faithful Christians go to heaven? Review of the June 2011 Watchtower Public Edition

In this review, I would like to address an article written by the Watchtower titled, "Do all faithful Christians go to heaven?"  While it is common for the organization to mention their so-called "two-class system," whereby Christians will be eternally separated into a class in heaven (consisting of 144,000 anointed Jehovah's Witnesses) and a class on earth (the rest of faithful Jehovah's Witnesses); it is not all that common for a full article to be written on the subject.

While there is nothing new here, it is important that these issues be addressed.  As I mentioned in this REVIEW, there are some profound implications in holding to this doctrine that goes far beyond one's eternal location.  Another reason for addressing this is to equip those interested in reaching JW's on an issue that is often overlooked in so-called "counter-cult apologetics."  Lord willing, this review will provide something insightful for both JW's and non-JW's.

 Many have read Jesus’ comforting words: “God loved the world so much that he gave his only-begotten Son, in order that everyone exercising faith in him might not be destroyed but have everlasting life.” (John 3:16) Did Jesus mean that all faithful worshippers of his Father, Jehovah God, would go to heaven to enjoy everlasting life in true happiness? 

Note Jesus’ thought- provoking statement: “No man has ascended into heaven but he that descended from heaven, the Son of man.” (John 3: 13) This implies that faithful worshippers in the past, such as Noah, Abraham, Moses, and David, had not gone to heaven. (Acts 2:34) Where, then, did they all go? In brief: The faithful of old are in the grave, sleeping in death, un- conscious, awaiting resurrection.—Ecclesiastes

9:5, 6; Acts 24:15.

For the sake of avoiding an issue that could potentially cloud the discussion, I would like to assume the Watchtower is correct on these points.  However, one thing they say is correct; Jesus' statement does not say or imply that Christians will go to heaven for eternity.

The Bible’s first reference to heavenly life after death was also by Jesus. He told his apostles that he would prepare a place for them in heaven. (John 14:2, 3) This was something new for God’s people.

While it is true that life in heaven would be a new concept to any Jew, it is not true that John 14:2-3 has something to do with this.

“In My Father’s house are many dwelling places; if it were not so, I would have told you; for I go to prepare a place for you.“If I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to Myself, that where I am, there you may be also.”

(John 14:2–3)

A quick glance at this verse may reveal that what the Watchtower says is true.  But a closer look may reveal otherwise.  Notice what Jesus will do after the "preparation"; he will "come again."  Where will he come to?  Could it be that Christ comes to earth, since "heaven must receive [him] until the period of restoration (Acts 3:21)?"  If Christ comes to earth, where will the "receiving" take place?  It seems that this will take place on earth since Christ is said to, "descend from heaven...then we...will...meet the Lord in the air." (1 Thess. 4:16-17)

But what are the "dwelling places...prepared for you?"  Whatever it is, could it be the same city that is being prepared for Abraham and others for whom the Watchtower claims an "earthly hope?"

“But as it is, they desire a better country, that is, a heavenly one. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God; for He has prepared a city for them.”

(Hebrews 11:16)

There are also several texts which speak of a "place prepared" that is specifically referring to the preparation of believers.

“For He has been counted worthy of more glory than Moses, by just so much as the builder of the house has more honor than the house. For every house is built by someone, but the builder of all things is God. Now Moses was faithful in all His house as a servant, for a testimony of those things which were to be spoken later; but Christ was faithful as a Son over His house — whose house we are, if we hold fast our confidence and the boast of our hope firm until the end.”

(Hebrews 3:3–6)

“you also, as living stones, are being built up as a spiritual house for a holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ.”

(1 Peter 2:5) 

“So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are fellow citizens with the saints, and are of God’s household, having been built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus Himself being the corner stone,in whom the whole building, being fitted together, is growing into a holy temple in the Lord, in whom you also are being built together into a dwelling of God in the Spirit.”

(Ephesians 2:19–22 NAS95)

 If one is to insist that Jesus is preparing and building a literal place, then cross references should be provided as have been done above.  However, there is nothing inconsistent in the view that the preparing is actually the body of believers and the kingdom itself.

The apostle Paul later explained that after Jesus’ death and resurrection to heaven, Jesus ‘inaugurated for his disciples a new and living way’—a way no other human had traveled before.—Hebrews 10:19, 20.

While it is true that these verses are speaking of a "new way," it is not the case that it is referring to "going to heaven."  In fact, the very next 2 verses explicitly assert what v. 19-20 are speaking of.

“and since we have a great priest over the house of God, let us draw near with a sincere heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water.”

(Hebrews 10:21–22)

The "new way" is the privilege of believers to now "draw near" to God through Christ as their high priest.  If one has this privilege in this life, why would one think that they must go to heaven to do so?  Also consider Revelation 21:3, where God draws near to us by "dwelling among" us.  This happens after the "holy city" (Hebrews 11:16, 12:22) comes "down out of heaven from God" onto the new earth.

Does this mean that from then on all faithful ones would go to heaven? No, for resurrection to heaven is closely related to an assignment given only to some humans. On their last evening together, Jesus told his apostles that they would “sit on thrones to judge” in his heavenly Kingdom. Thus, ruling with Jesus in heaven was to be their assignment.—Luke 22:28-30.

This interpretation assumes two things:

1. Jesus' eschatological kingdom will be in heaven.
2. The judgment thrones will be in heaven.

Contrary to what the Watchtower says, Luke 22:28-30 specifies neither of these.  However, it is interesting that Jesus mentions "eating and drinking" in the kingdom (also mentioned in Luke 14:15; Matthew 26:29).  Will there really be eating and drinking in heaven?  Furthermore, it is interesting that Luke 13:28-29 mentions, "Abraham and Isaac and Jacob and all the prophets in the kingdom of God...reclining at the table"; a group of people the Watchtower claims will not be in heaven.

Besides the apostles, other humans would also be given this marvelous commission. In a vision, the apostle John saw Jesus with a group of resurrected ones in heaven described as ‘a kingdom and priests to rule over the earth.’ (Revelation 3:21; 5:10)  

Again, neither of these texts mention heaven.  Furthermore, the Watchtower takes it for granted that "over" can just as easily be translated as "upon," which is how many translations render it. In fact, the Kingdom Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures, published by the Watchtower, renders it as such (see the left column):

But regardless of what epi can be translated as; what is important is what it means in the context.  One lexicon defines epi in the context of Revelation 5:10 as,

⑨ marker of power, authority, control of or over someone or someth., over

ⓐ w. gen. (Hdt. 5, 109 al.; Mitt-Wilck. I/1, 124, 1=BGU 1120, 1 [5 b.c.] πρωτάρχῳ ἐ. τοῦ κριτηρίου; 287, 1; LXX; AscIs 2:5 τοῦ ἐ. τῶν πραγματε[ι] ῶν=Denis p. 109) βασιλεύειν ἐ. τινος (Judg 9:8, 10; 1 Km 8:7) Rv 5:10

-William Arndt, Frederick W. Danker and Walter Bauer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 3rd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), 365.

  

 In the context of Revelation 5:10, it is not location that is in view, but authority.

How many of them were there? As in every government, only a limited number govern. So, too, with this heavenly Kingdom. Jesus, the Lamb of God, rules with 144,000 corulers “bought from among mankind.”—Revelation 14:1, 4, 5.

There is an interesting contrast between what John "saw" and what he "heard."

• John saw, "the Lamb standing on Mount Zion, and with Him one hundred and forty-four thousand..."
• John heard, "a voice from heaven, like the sound of many waters..."

What John saw must have been relative to his location, which would have been earth since this is contrasted to what he heard from heaven.  Therefore, it is reasonable to infer that v. 1 depicts an earthly scene rather than one in heaven.

True, 144,000 is a small number compared with the number of all faithful ones, past and present.

What the Watchtower fails to mention is that the "anointed" class must be a group larger than a literal 144,000 in light of the following,

“But the Jerusalem above is free; she is our mother. For it is written, “REJOICE, BARREN WOMAN WHO DOES NOT BEAR; BREAK FORTH AND SHOUT, YOU WHO ARE NOT IN LABOR; FOR MORE NUMEROUS ARE THE CHILDREN OF THE DESOLATE THAN OF THE ONE WHO HAS A HUSBAND.””

(Galatians 4:26–27)

According to the Watchtower, the "children of the desolate" are the anointed class of 144,000 whereas the "one who has a husband" is in reference to natural Israel.  However, it is doubtful that the Watchtower is prepared to argue that natural Israel was smaller in number than 144,000.

But this is understandable because the 144,000 are resurrected to heaven for a specific sacred assignment of work. If you were to build a house, would you contract all the skilled builders in your area? No. You would need only as many as were required for the job. Similarly, not all faithful ones are chosen by God for the unique privilege of ruling with Christ in heaven.

This heavenly government will accomplish God’s original purpose for mankind. Jesus and his 144,000 corulers will oversee the transformation of the earth into a global paradise, where an untold number of faithful ones will live forever in happiness. (Isaiah 45:18; Revelation 21: 3, 4) This will include those in God’s memory, who will be resurrected.—John 5:28, 29.

Every faithful worshipper of Jehovah—past or present—can receive the marvelous gift of everlasting life. (Romans 6:23) A few will receive life in heaven for a special assignment, and the great majority will receive life on earth in a global paradise.

While is true that the earth will one day be restored to a paradise (Revelation 21:1), it is not the case that there will be a "heavenly government" whereby a literal 144,000 will rule in heaven with Christ over the rest of faithful Christians living on the earth.  Instead, the eternal dwelling for all Christians on the new earth is far more consistent with the Scriptures.

If you would like to read this issue of the Watchtower in its entirety, you can download the PDF HERE

Review of the June 15, 2011 Watchtower Study Edition

You can download this issue of the Watchtower HERE

The most noteworthy quotations are found on p. 15,

19 The fact that the God of love counted Abraham as righteous should be heartening for true Christians today. Jehovah did not declare him righteous in the sense that he does those whom he anoints with spirit to be “joint heirs with Christ.” The limited number of that group are “called to be holy ones” and are accepted as “God’s sons.” (Rom. 1:7; 8:14, 17, 33) In contrast, Abraham came to be “Jehovah’s friend”—and that before the ransom sacrifice was offered. (Jas. 2: 23; Isa. 41:8) What, then, about true Christians who hope to live in the restored earthly Paradise?

20 These have not received “the free gift of righteousness” with heavenly life in view “through the release by the ransom paid by Christ Jesus.” (Rom. 3:24; 5:15, 17) Nevertheless, they exercise deep faith in God and his provisions, and they manifest their faith by good works. One such work is that of “preaching the kingdom of God . . . and teaching the things concerning the Lord Je- sus Christ.” (Acts 28:31) Thus, Jehovah can view these as righteous in the sense that he did Abraham. The gift such ones receive —friendship with God—differs from “the free gift” the anointed receive. Yet, it certainly is a gift that they accept with deep gratitude.

Would any Jehovah's Witnesses care to explain this?

Jehovah's Witnesses: are you the only ones who hold to Paradise Earth?

This is a video I made in promoting the fact that not only JW's believe in Paradise Earth as the eternal hope for Christians.  The clips are from a round-table eschatology discussion between John Piper, Doug Wilson, Sam Storms, and Jim Hamilton. If you are interested in eschatology, i'd recommend watching/listening to the full 2 hour discussion whereby the various eschatological views are discussed and debated. You can watch it HERE.

Acts Bible study this Sunday for JW's, Ex-JW's, Christians, or whoever

I will be there with the nick, "TheApologeticfront"



Video description:

To participate, go to paltalk.com for the free download. We will be using audio only so there is no need to pay for an upgrade. If you wish you will have the opportunity to share your thoughts in two ways, either by speaking through a microphone or using the text section.

The name of the room is: Jehovahs Witness Christian Bible Discussion (no apostrophe in Jehovah)

Please note that this is not meant to be a forum for hostile debate or insults. This is an opportunity to come and reason together in a way reflects Christian principles. I understand that we will not all agree on all things but when we disagree we will do it with "gentleness and respect."

The room will open at 2:30 pm central time every Sunday. At 3:00 pm a short talk will start and then the discussion will begin.

Interview with Greg Stafford

Greg Stafford is a Jehovah's Witness who is no longer associated with the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society.  He has written SEVERAL BOOKS which both defend and criticize particular elements of the Watchtower Society.  The fact that Stafford is so critical of the organization, yet holds to many of its core doctrines, make him quite an interesting and unique apologist.

Recently, Stafford was interviewed by the SIX SCREENS OF THE WATCHTOWER TELENETWORK with regards to his stance on many issues.  Regardless of what you think of Stafford, if you are interested in Jehovah's Witnesses, you should find this interview interesting.  And yes, you'll hear his arguments against the Trinity and other doctrines held by "Christendom."  But you'll also hear his criticisms against the Watchtower Society and why he left.  On that end, any faithful JW in association with the Watchtower will be obliged to view him as an apostate and treated accordingly.  But I do hope that those same JW's will give this interview a chance and perhaps learn something new.

The interview was very disorganized and distracting, as it was held in a conference call format with many honing in to ask questions.  The interview starts at about 20 minutes in, but the full mp3 file is almost 6 hours long.  I haven't gotten through the whole thing, but I doubt Stafford was on the whole time.

If anyone has any thoughts, i'd be very interested in hearing them.  You can download or listen to the mp3 HERE.

Governing Body self-promotion in the May 15, 2011 Watchtower Study Edition

I'm always wondering why the Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses; those 7 men residing in Brooklyn, NY, seem to keen on reminding their followers who is really in charge. To those who are not one of Jehovah's Witnesses, consider what it would be like if your pastor reminded all in the congregation that they are to submit to his counsel and exhortations. But to make this more comparative to Jehovah's Witnesses, consider if your pastor did this every other Sunday. What would your congregation think of such a person?

Such is not far from the truth when it comes to the Governing Body. Why do these men so regularly promote their authority? Is it because their followers are regularly out of line? Are Jehovah's Witnesses regularly questioning whether these men are who they claim to be (i.e. chosen by Christ in 1919)? Anyone who has spent much time with JW's should know that most JW's have absolute unquestionable submission to the Governing Body. Therefore, it seems odd that they need to stress these points as much as they do.

Consider the recent statements made in the MAY 15, 2011 WATCHTOWER STUDY EDITION:

We do well to examine how we respond to timely Scriptural counsel presented in our Bible-based publications. By studying the Scriptures and attending congregation meetings, we are reminded of the sayings of Christ. (2 Pet. 3:1, 2) We show our heartfelt appreciation for this supply of spiritual food by regularly partaking of it. What, though, should be our reaction if certain counsel is repeated occasionally? For example, God’s Word counsels Christians to marry “only in the Lord.” (1 Cor. 7:39) For over a century, this subject has periodically been discussed in The Watchtower. Christ’s brothers surely demonstrate their loving concern for our spiritual welfare by publishing articles on this and other inspired counsel. Paying attention to these reminders is one way to show that we are following our perfect Leader, Jesus Christ. (p. 27, par. 1)

It is interesting that the Watchtower mentions the "occasional" repetition of various topics. This may be in answer to those who wonder why the Governing Body needs to so regularly remind their followers who are in charge. The answer is: "out of concern." But what is the Governing Body so concerned with? Are they concerned with the spiritual well being of followers of Christ, or whether followers of Christ will be followers of them with absolute unquestionable submission?

The last question in the paragraph is indirectly one of the key elements of control the Governing Body has on their followers: if you don't accept their "reminders," you are not a true follower of Christ. This is a restatement of one of the most controlling and self-promoting statements ever made by the Governing Body:

***w10 9/15 p. 23 ‘Your leader is one, the Christ’***

The anointed and their other sheep companions recognize that by following the lead of the modern-day Governing Body, they are in fact following their Leader, Christ.

There is little more that can be said to stress the type of submission one is to have towards the Governing Body, even when offering "refinements" on teachings that are no longer held:

“The path of the righteous ones is like the bright light that is getting lighter and lighter until the day is firmly established,” states Proverbs 4:18. Yes, Jesus’ leadership is progressive, not stagnant. Another way to cooperate with Christ’s “brothers” is to have a positive attitude toward any refinements in our understanding of Scriptural truths as published by “the faithful and discreet slave.”—Matt. 24:45. (p. 27 par. 2)

Though Proverbs 4:18 has nothing to do with doctrine or Bible teachings, the JW is obligated to accept the interpretation of the Governing Body without question. But what happens when a teaching is abandoned in favor of a new teaching? For instance, when organ transplants were once forbidden, how many faithful JW's risked their health for the Watchtower? When the teaching was abandoned, did the Watchtower offer an apology? According to the above quote, none would be needed. Why? Because JW's are to have a "positive attitude" towards these refinements, even if loved ones were needlessly lost in the process.

But what if the Governing Body is clearly teaching something that you know to be false and unbiblical?

*** w57 5/1 p. 284 par. 14 Trust Your Proved, Faithful Brothers ***

Showing respect for Jehovah’s organization really resolves itself down to our attitude toward God’s visible channel and the trust that we place in our proved, faithful brothers. If we have become thoroughly convinced that this is Jehovah’s organization, that he is guiding and directing his people, then we shall not be unsettled by anything that happens. If something comes up that we do not understand we will wait patiently until it is made thoroughly clear to us. If we feel sure something is wrong we will ‘keep the commandment’ of our Father and take whatever theocratic steps are open to us and then wait on Jehovah. We will not ‘forsake our mother’s teaching’ by immediately beginning to criticize and find fault. We will realize that Jehovah knows what is going on in his organization, and if he is willing to permit it, who are we to insist it should be different? If we really have faith, we will know that if it is wrong he will straighten it out eventually, and we are far safer inside his organization even with these minor difficulties than we would be on the outside where only chaos and destruction await us.

Some may feel that this is speaking of those who have haughty attitudes towards the teachings of the Governing Body. But such is not the case. The faithful JW is to have unquestionable acceptance of anything that is put in print by the Watchtower. If they choose not to, they are rejecting or questioning God Himself:

*** w57 6/15 p. 370 par. 7 Overseers of Jehovah’s People ***

Yes, particularly since 1919 has it been true that he has appointed the collective body of the anointed remnant over all the visible interests of the Kingdom. The “slave” then became responsible not only for ministering to the needs of the anointed body members but also for taking on the responsibility of preaching the good news of the established Kingdom to people of all nations. (Matt. 24:14) Such is true not by their determination of it, but because God himself has so directed. “God has set the members in the body, each one of them, just as he pleased,” is the way it is pictured in 1 Corinthians 12:18 (NW). It is vital that we appreciate this fact and respond to the directions of the “slave” as we would to the voice of God, because it is His provision.

*** w59 5/1 p. 269 pars. 6-7 Attain Completeness in the New World Society ***

7 To hold to the headship of Christ, it is therefore necessary to obey the organization that he is personally directing. Doing what the organization says is to do what he says. Resisting the organization is to resist him

Therefore, one is not to just have a "positive attitude" towards the Governing Body and what they teach; they are to have absolute unquestionable acceptance of even those teachings they know to be false. To resist these teachings is to resist God (yes, even if they are false teachings).

I hope all Jehovah's Witnesses reading this will consider who their allegiance is really to: God or men? Biblically, the only one we should have absolute unquestionable devotion to is Jesus Christ Himself; not seven men in Brooklyn, NY. After all, Scripture never says of a Governing Body,

“in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge. I say this so that no one will delude you with persuasive argument.”
(Colossians 2:3–4)

***UPDATE***

Mark wrote an excellent article (far better than mine) on the same topic that can be found HERE

Did Jesus Return invisibly in 1914?

The following is a paper I wrote that is based on the Watchtower publication, WHAT DOES THE BIBLE REALLY TEACH; specifically, the APPENDIX where 1914 is discussed. This paper is short in length in hopes that it will provide a simple understanding of the problems related to 1914. This date is a key issue for any Jehovah's Witnesses. It is recommended not only for Jehovah's Witnesses themselves to read, but especially for those who are studying to become a witness or seeking to reach them.

This paper can be downloaded and distributed freely. Click HERE to download.

Also, I made a 3 part video series which presents the same material:

PART 1

PART 2

PART 3

Were Jehovah's Witnesses chosen by Jesus Christ in 1919?

*** w08 5/15 p. 26 Pursue “Holiness in God’s Fear” ***

For his modern-day servants on earth, Jehovah opened “the Way of Holiness” leading away from Babylon the Great, the world empire of false religion. In 1919 he freed anointed Christians from spiritual bondage to false religion, and they progressively cleansed their worship of all false teachings. As Jehovah’s worshippers today, we enjoy a clean, tranquil spiritual environment in which we can worship Jehovah and have a peaceful relationship with him and with our fellow man.

1. Can you prove from the Bible that Jehovah's Witnesses were exclusively appointed by Jesus Christ in 1919?

2. Can you prove from the Bible that Jesus Christ did an inspection of all religions in the world in that year?

3. Can you prove that Jehovah's Witnesses had been freed from the practices of false religion in that year?

"Keep on the Watch!"....by proclaiming false dates?

In this blog, i'd like to offer some commentary on a Watchtower article that explains their self-proclaimed "overeagerness" as it relates to the predicting of "the time of the end."  But more importantly, i'd like to display a balanced view of how followers of Christ should seek God's Kingdom as it relates to Christ parousia.

*** w84 12/1 p. 17 par. 12 Keep Ready! ***

When the enthroned Lord Jesus inspected his household in 1919, he found the group of Christians associated with the Watchtower magazine loyally striving to “keep on the watch” with the help of spiritual “food at the proper time.” Until this very day, that “slave” class has faithfully continued to provide spiritual food to enable the Master’s “domestics” and their companions to “keep looking, keep awake.”—Mark 13:33.

Here we have the Jehovah's Witnesses' claim to "faithfulness" to the exclusion of all other religious groups per Jesus' inspection in 1919.  This matter cannot be overstated given the fact that it is Jesus Christ himself who made the appointment, rather than a self-proclaimed appointment.  Though it is not my intent to be a "faultfinder," no one can be blamed for seeking to test this organization in light of its claims; especially when it is the claim of Jesus Christ himself!  The question is, has the Watchtower been faithful in producing "spiritual food" that passes the inspection of Jesus Christ?  I can only imagine the standards that the Son of God would implement in inspecting a particular religious group for faithfulness and dispensing "spiritual food at the proper time"; surely a stricter set of standards than what I could come up with!

*** w84 12/1 p. 18 par. 13 Keep Ready! ***

It is easy for the established churches of Christendom and other people to criticize Jehovah’s Witnesses because their publications have, at times, stated that certain things could take place on certain dates. But is not such line of action in harmony with Christ’s injunction to “keep on the watch”? (Mark 13:37)

This is an interesting claim, given the statements made just one sentence prior.  On one hand, they have the highest possible standard set for themselves with the divine approval of Jesus Christ.  But on the other hand, they can be excused for setting false dates?  While it is true that Jesus commanded His followers in the first century to "keep on the watch," is it also true that they set specific dates for "the time of the end?"  This is quite confusing because The Watchtower has, on several occasions, criticized others for doing precisely what they have commended themselves for doing:

*** g93 3/22 p. 3 Why So Many False Alarms? ***

THE story is told of a boy who watched the sheep of the villagers. To stir up a bit of excitement, one day he cried out, “Wolf! Wolf!” when there was no wolf. The villagers rushed out with clubs to drive off the wolf, only to find that there was none. It was such great fun that later on the boy repeated his cry. Again the villagers rushed out with their clubs, only to discover that it was another false alarm. After that a wolf did come, and the boy sounded the warning, “Wolf! Wolf!” but the villagers dismissed his cry as another false alarm. They had been fooled too often.

So it has become with those who proclaim the end of the world. Down through the centuries since Jesus’ day, so many unfulfilled predictions have been made that many no longer take them seriously.

***g68 10/8 p. 23 ‘A Time to ‘Lift up your head’ in confident hope”***

 True, there have been those in times past who predicted an “end to the world,” even announcing a specific date.  Some have gathered groups of people with them and fled to the hills or withdrawn into their houses waiting for the end.  Yet, nothing happened.  The “end” did not come.  They were guilty of false prophesying.  Why? What was missing? 

Missing was the full measure of evidence required in fulfillment of Bible prophecy.  Missing from such people were God’s truths and the evidence that he was guiding and using them. 

Is this a double standard that the Watchtower has set for themselves?  It would seem that when they proclaim a false date, it is to be commended for "keeping on the watch" in harmony with Christ's words.  But when someone else does it, they are "false prophets" that "no one should take seriously."

Since it is Jesus' words that should hold the most value to us as followers of Him, what does He say about those who predict things that don't come to pass?

“See to it that you are not misled; for many will come in My name, saying, ‘I am He,’ and, ‘The time is near.’ Do not go after them.”(Luke 21:8)  

“Beware of the false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves.” (Matthew 7:15) 

 If Jesus warns against those who claim that "the time is near," then how could it be that He appointed and approved of a group who not only presents a double standard, but has emphatically predicted the time to be near (with an exact date in mind) on more than one occasion?

*** w84 12/1 p. 18 par. 13 Keep Ready! ***

On the other hand, have Christendom’s churches encouraged Christian watchfulness by teaching that the Kingdom is “the ruling of God in our hearts”? Have they not, rather, encouraged spiritual sluggishness by considering expectation of “the end” to be “meaningless” or “an insignificant myth”? Have apostates who claim that “the last days” began at Pentecost and cover the entire Christian Era promoted Christian alertness? Have they not, rather, induced spiritual sleepiness?

Actually, a large portion of "Christendom" has held a much louder and more prominent voice in proclaiming "the end is near" than what Jehovah's Witnesses have done.  A sales count on books like The Late Great Planet Earth by Hal Lindsey and The Left Behind Series by Tim LaHaye proves just how widespread this is amongst Christendom.  Even in 1984 when this article was published, "Christendom" had already bought into the "end times" hysteria.  So who exactly is The Watchtower criticizing here?

*** w84 12/1 p. 18 par. 14 Keep Ready! ***

¹⁴ True, some expectations that appeared to be backed up by Bible chronology did not materialize at the anticipated time. But is it not far preferable to make some mistakes because of overeagerness to see God’s purposes accomplished than to be spiritually asleep as to the fulfillment of Bible prophecy? 

I'm not so sure about that.  The last time I checked, the Bible had some very stern words towards those who make false predictions in God's name that aren't said of those who are "spiritually asleep":

“‘But the prophet who speaks a word presumptuously in My name which I have not commanded him to speak, or which he speaks in the name of other gods, that prophet shall die.’ “You may say in your heart, ‘How will we know the word which YHWH has not spoken?’ “When a prophet speaks in the name of YHWH, if the thing does not come about or come true, that is the thing which YHWH has not spoken. The prophet has spoken it presumptuously; you shall not be afraid of him.”(Deuteronomy 18:20–22) 

And just to clear up any doubt as to who these words could be qualified to:

*** rs p. 132 False Prophets ***

False Prophets

Definition: Individuals and organizations proclaiming messages that they attribute to a superhuman source but that do not originate with the true God and are not in harmony with his revealed will.

***w/30 5/15 p. 155***

 The difference between a true and false prophet is that the one is speaking the word of the Lord and the other is speaking his own dreams and guesses…The true prophet of God today will be telling forth what the Bible teaches, and those things that the Bible tells us are soon to come to pass.  He will not be sounding forth man-made theories or guesses, either his own or those of others…This text proves again that those men who foretell things out of harmony with the Bible statements are false prophets.  

In light of these claims, is the Watchtower being inconsistent when they claim the following:

1. Making false prediction where "certain things happened on certain dates" is "in line with Christ's injunction to 'keep on the watch'"

2. Those who "announce a specific date" of "the end of the world" that "did not come...are guilty of false prophecying."

To back up these claims, the Watchtower provides some biblical examples that are to serve as parallels to their setting dates:

*** w84 12/1 pp. 18-19 pars. 14-15 Keep Ready! ***

Did not Moses make a 40-year miscalculation in trying to act ahead of time to remove Israel’s affliction? (Genesis 15:13; Acts 7:6, 17, 23, 25, 30, 34) Were not Christ’s apostles overanxious to see the Kingdom established, not to speak of their complete misunderstanding as to what the Kingdom really is? (Acts 1:6; compare Luke 19:11; 24:21.) Were not the anointed Christians in Thessalonica impatient to see “the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ” and “the day of Jehovah”?—2 Thessalonians 2:1, 2.

¹⁵ There is nothing basically unscriptural in using chronology in efforts to learn “the appointed time” for the fulfillment of God’s purposes. (Habakkuk 2:3) Daniel calculated when Jerusalem’s devastation was due to end. (Daniel 9:1, 2) The first-century faithful Jewish remnant were in expectation of the coming of the Messiah because they calculated the end of a time, based on prophecy. (Daniel 9:25; Luke 3:15) Late 19th-century and early 20th-century Christians were enabled to live in expectation of God’s Kingdom rule well before 1914 because they calculated when “the appointed times of the nations” were due to end. (Luke 21:24; Daniel 4:16, 17) It was, therefore, understandable why efforts were made to use other Biblical time indications to try to find out when the long-awaited hopes might become a reality. Faithful servants of Jehovah in the past cried out: “How long, O Jehovah?”—Isaiah 6:11; Psalm 74:10; 94:3.

One is encouraged to look up each one of these biblical references and consider whether these are an accurate parallel to the "end of the world" predictions that the Watchtower has made as "God's channel of communication":

“We see no reason for changing the figures—nor could we change them if we would.  They are, we believe, God’s dates, not ours.  But bear in mind that the end of 1914 is not the date for the beginning, but for the end of the time of trouble.  We see no reason for changing from our opinion expressed in the View presented in the Watch Tower of Jan. 15, ’92.  We advise that it be read again.” –Zion’s Watch Tower, July 15, 1894 p. 226

“Also, in the year 1918, when God destroys the churches wholesale and the church member by millions, it shall be that any that escape shall come to the works of Pastor Russell to learn the meaning of the downfall of “Christianity.” –The Boiling Caldron p. 485

“Therefore we may confidently expect that 1925 will mark the return of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and the faithful prophets of old, particularly those named by the Apostle in Hebrews chapter eleven, to the condition of human perfection.” –Millions Now Living will Never Die  1920, p. 90

 Hopefully one can see that there is a vast difference between the miscalculation of a chronology and predicting something in God's name that doesn't come to pass (Deut. 18:20-22).  Even the Watchtower's own writings reveal this.  But their statement, "There is nothing basically unscriptural in using chronology in efforts to learn 'the appointed time' for the fulfillment of God’s purposes" reveals ignorance on their part or an unwillingness to apply their own standards to themselves.  

*** w84 12/1 p. 19 pars. 16-18 Keep Ready! ***

¹⁶ Since Jesus clearly stated that no man could know “that day” or “the hour” when the Father will order his son to ‘come’ against Satan’s wicked system of things, some may ask: ‘Why is it so urgent to live in expectation of the end?’ It is urgent because practically in the same breath, Jesus added: “Keep looking, keep awake . . . keep on the watch.” (Mark 13:32-35) The “sign” of Jesus’ parousia has been in evidence since 1914. We now await “the sign of the Son of man,” when he ‘comes’ as Jehovah’s Executioner.

¹⁷ When Jesus gave the first-century Judean Christians a sign whereby they would know that the time had come to flee from Jerusalem, he insisted on the need to act immediately. (Luke 21:20-23) Why all the urgency, since nearly four years elapsed from the appearing of the sign in 66 C.E. and the actual destruction of Jerusalem in 70 C.E.? Because Jesus knew that if they delayed, they would keep putting off their flight and eventually be caught by the Roman armies.

¹⁸ Similarly today, it would be highly dangerous for Christians to rationalize about the urgency of our times and adopt a “cruising speed” attitude that reflects doubt about the nearness of the end.

Of course it would be unbiblical for Christians to adopt a "cruising speed" attitude towards the day when Christ will return.  The problem with the Watchtower is that they have adopted a completely unbalanced mindset towards end times chronologies and predictions to the point of rationalization, whereas the true follower of Christ lives each day with the realization that the end could come; not in overeagerness, but with balance.  Such swaying could lead to some very serious consequences that the Watchtower has yet to take responsibility of.  The word of the Lord Jesus are quite clear towards those who cause such stumbling:

“Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe to stumble, it would be better for him if, with a heavy millstone hung around his neck, he had been cast into the sea.” (Mark 9:42)

One who associates themselves with such an organization would do well to ask themselves who their loyalty is with; God or man?  I pray that if this question is something you are contemplating, then you will find what can only be found in the person of Jesus Christ:

“Come to Me, all who are weary and heavy-laden, and I will give you rest.“Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and YOU WILL FIND REST FOR YOUR SOULS.” (Matthew 11:28–29)

Dialogue/Debate on the Watchtower's "two class" theology

Recenly, I engaged an apologists named STANDFIRM on the Watchtower's "two class" theology on the TOPIX discussion forum. Also joining me was an apologist by the name of "TruthSeeker," who holds a very similar position to me on this issue. Of course, some others chimed in on the discussion, but it was primarily the three of us. As far as I could tell, we covered most aspects of this issue, focusing on many of the "heaven texts," in which me and TruthSeeker argued that all Christians have an eternal hope on a restored earth rather than the WT's view of 144,000 in heaven and the rest living on earth.

Admittedly, I do not hold to the traditional view amongst many of those who oppose JW's, where they argue that Christians will not spend eternity on earth; instead, they will all go to heaven. The reason being, I've found this view (i.e. restored earth) to be more consistent and theologically defensible. Anyway, you can read the entire discussion titled, "Debate on the Eternal Destiny of Christians" HERE.

This also led me to the idea of doing more of a formal debate on this issue, whether audio/video or written. However, getting a JW to do any sort of debate like this is practically a shot in the dark and has no better chance of happening than a snowball in a blast furnace. But hey, I thought i'd give it a shot.

Jehovah's Witnesses: How does your preaching work compare with this?

Before I delve into this question, i'd like to display The Watchtower's own thoughts concerning their preaching work and how it compares to the rest of so-called "Christendom":

*** w55 10/15 p. 624 par. 9 The Triumphant Message of “The Kingdom” ***

The missionaries of Christendom throughout the earth number into the thousands. Despite all these, it is not too much to say that Jehovah’s witnesses are the only ones preaching “this good news of the kingdom.” Why? Because they are the only ones that see the established kingdom in the light of modern events interpreted by Bible prophecy, and they are the only ones with the faith and courage from God to preach it.

There cannot be a more exclusive claim than this.  Indeed, Jehovah's Witnesses (over 6 million worldwide in a concerted effort) are preaching "The Kingdom" and "Bible prophecy."  Of course, many in "Christendom" would proclaim a similar message.  But The Watchtower is very clear in their exclusive distinction:

*** w81 5/1 p. 17 par. 3 If God Has an Organization, What Is It? ***

Let the honest-hearted person compare the kind of preaching of the gospel of the Kingdom done by the religious systems of Christendom during all the centuries with that done by Jehovah’s Witnesses since the end of World War I in 1918. They are not one and the same kind. That of Jehovah’s Witnesses is really “gospel,” or “good news,” as of God’s heavenly kingdom that was established by the enthronement of his Son Jesus Christ at the end of the Gentile Times in 1914. (Luke 21:24)

Though the Society will admit that there are missionaries in Christendom that "preach," they place themselves in stark contrast by the fact that they are the only ones preaching 1914 as Christ's enthronement.  In light of this, they emphatically proclaim the nearness of God's judgment on babylon the great (i.e. "Christendom") and the rest of wicked mankind.  

But is there even the possibility that non-Jehovah's Witnesses are preaching the gospel?  According to The Watchtower:

*** w95 9/1 p. 18 par. 18 Christian Witnesses for Divine Sovereignty ***

¹⁸ The worldwide preaching of the good news helps to prove that Jesus’ royal presence has begun. (Matthew 24:3) Further, it is the main means by which “the harvest of the earth” is being reaped, as it points people to the only true hope for mankind, Jehovah’s Kingdom. (Revelation 14:15, 16) Since only genuine Christians share in the preaching of the good news, this important work helps to distinguish the true Christians from the false. (Malachi 3:18) 

Since the Jehovah's Witnesses are the only ones proclaiming "the gospel of 1914," then all non-Jehovah's Witnesses are false Christians.  They are nothing more than sincere messengers proclaiming a false gospel that will ultimately incur the judgment of God upon themselves and the rest who were deceived by their false gospel.  

At this point, i'd like any Jehovah's Witnesses watching this to give consideration to the following video, whereby one of "Christendom's" missionaries preaches what he believes to be the "gospel" to two individuals.  In doing so, please think about the following:

1. Is this a false gospel?

2. Is this a false gospel because he neglected to mention 1914?

3.  Was it a false gospel because he neglected to mention how "close we are to the end?"

4.  Is it a false gospel because he failed to mention that salvation can only be found in being in association with his organization?

5.  Is it a false gospel because he never mentioned "Jehovah?"

6.  Should he have left out all the stuff about repentance and placing faith in Jesus' atoning work in favor of proclaiming 1914 and "how close we are to the end?"

7.  In one encounter, could you as a Jehovah's Witness provide the necessary information whereby one could avoid the impending judgment that could come on that very day?

8.  What other approaches did this man use that were wrong and worthy of being called a "false gospel?"

If you would, please watch the following video and provide some commentary on how "Christendom" needs to abandon this message and proclaim the true gospel:

Review of the February 15, 2011 Watchtower Study Edition

You can download the full issue HERE.

Since my REVIEW of the September 2010 Watchtower Study Edition, I haven't found any of the subsequent magazines to contain noteworthy information.  Perhaps the Governing Body is giving JW's a break from their self-promoting statements made in that issue?  Its difficult to know for sure.  But whatever the case, recent releases have had little to do with doctrine and more to do with morality and JW living.  However, I found a few quotes in this newly released magazine worth mentioning:

Acting in harmony with his Father’s will, Jesus Christ gave “his soul a ransom in exchange for many.” (Matt. 20:28) Soon the full benefits of that ransom payment will accrue to those who gain God’s approval. -p. 14 par. 6

While it is true that no Christian is living within the full benefits of the atonement (Creation is still "groaning." Rom. 8:22), this quote has it backwards.  It is unbiblical to suggest that the ransom is applied to those who gain God's approval.  Instead, the Bible teaches that the atonement itself results in God's approval to those whom it is applied:

“Now all these things are from God, who reconciled us to Himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation, namely, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and He has committed to us the word of reconciliation. Therefore, we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God were making an appeal through us; we beg you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God. He made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.” (2 Corinthians 5:18–21) 

Does this passage make any suggestion similar to the WT's appeal?  That is, is the atonement applied to those who have previously gained God's approval?  Or does the atonement result in our being approved by God?  Notice further that it is not our actions that reconcile us to God; it is Christ's atoning work.  This is yet another instance where the WT has missed the sufficiency of Christ's death apart from human actions.

8 Gaining God’s approval involves the proper exercise of our free will. This is because Jehovah does not coerce anyone into serving him. In Isaiah’s time, He asked: “Whom shall I send, and who will go for us?” By recognizing the prophet’s right to decide, Jehovah dignified him. Imagine Isaiah’s satisfaction in responding: “Here I am! Send me.”—Isa. 6:8. -p. 14 par. 8

Its all about us isn't it?  The focus is so completely man-centered that it neglects the very basis by which someone like Isaiah could obey God at all.  Why is it that Scripture declares, "there is none who seeks after God?" (Rom. 3:11)  Could it be that God desires all the glory, even when it pertains to man's ability to love and obey Him?  While it is true that God does not coerce men in the way that the WT describes here, it is not true that men gain God's approval by "proper exercise of our free will."  Scripture has something else in mind:

“Then I will sprinkle clean water on you, and you will be clean; I will cleanse you from all your filthiness and from all your idols. “Moreover, I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you; and I will remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh. “I will put My Spirit within you and cause you to walk in My statutes, and you will be careful to observe My ordinances.” (Ezekiel 36:25–27)

God is the primary cause when it comes to offering approval to those who were previously hostile towards Him (Rom. 8:7).  Do we see coercion here?  No.  We see God causing the ungodly to obey Him by removing their hostile, flesh-focused nature and making them, "alive together with Christ." (Eph. 2:5)  Where can man take such credit in this scenario?  Where is "free will" mentioned?

 Gaining God’s approval requires that a person keep his body acceptable to God. If he were to defile himself with tobacco, betel nut, illicit drugs, or alcohol abuse, that offering would have no value. (2 Cor. 7:1) -p. 15 par. 12

In no way am I endorsing any of the mentioned "defilements."  However, I do find it interesting that the WT mentions these disfellowshipping-resulting actions to the exclusion of others.  Why is eating at McDonald's not mentioned?  Is the Watchtower prepared to defend the idea that smoking a cigarette is more harmful than a few meals at McDonald's?  Or how about prescription drugs?  Are JW's threatened with disfellowshipping by taking drugs that lead a high risk of side effects?  Of course not.  These are the legalistic "pet sins" that the WT has come up with that have no cut-and-dry prohibition in the Bible (specifically, tobacco use).

By preaching with zeal, we give evidence of our love for Jehovah and our desire for his approval. -p. 16 par. 14

While it is true that we must demonstrate the true nature of our faith by good works (James 2:18), this is different from saying that our works gain approval from God.  A more biblical approach to such an issue would be to say, "by preaching with zeal, we give evidence of our love for Jehovah and our desire to do what is pleasing to Him."  The reason this qualification is so important is because true Christians have already been fully approved.  That is, there is no further approval to be made.  After all, we have the righteousness of Christ imputed or reckoned to our account (Rom. 4:5).  How much more approval would one need?

Instead, we should be seeking to do what is pleasing to God because we have already been approved.  And no amount of zeal or hours on your time cards can change that.

Andre ́ , who had served Jehovah for years, had the bitter experience of being led astray by apostate thinking. He felt that having a quick look at an apostate Web site would not be dangerous. He recalls: “Initially, I was attracted to the so-called truths that the apostates spoke of. The more I examined what they said, the more I came to think that I was justified in leaving Jehovah’s organization. But later, as I did some research on the apostates’ arguments against Jehovah’s Witnesses, I became aware of how crafty the false teachers were. Information taken out of context was their ‘strong evidence’ against us. Thus, I decided to start reading our publications again and to attend the meetings. Soon I realized how much I had missed.” Happily, Andre ́ returned to the congregation. -p. 19

This is very interesting.  Remember what the WT has previously said about so-called "apostate literature":

*** w86 3/15 p. 13 pars. 10-12 ‘Do Not Be Quickly Shaken From Your Reason’ ***

When a fellow human tells us, ‘Do not read this’ or, ‘Do not listen to that,’ we may be tempted to ignore his advice. But remember, in this case Jehovah is the One who tells us in his Word what to do. And what does he say about apostates? “Avoid them” (Romans 16:17, 18); “quit mixing in company with” them (1 Corinthians 5:11); and “never receive [them] into your homes or say a greeting to [them]” (2 John 9, 10). These are emphatic words, clear directions. If, out of curiosity, we were to read the literature of a known apostate, would that not be the same as inviting this enemy of true worship right into our home to sit down with us and relate his apostate ideas?

¹¹ Let us illustrate matters in this way: Suppose your teenage son received some pornographic material in the mail. What would you do? If he was inclined to read it out of curiosity, would you say: ‘Yes, son, go ahead and read it. It won’t hurt you. From infancy we’ve taught you that immorality is bad. Besides, you need to know what’s going on in the world in order to see that it’s truly bad’? Would you reason that way? Absolutely not! Rather, you would surely point out the dangers of reading pornographic literature and would require that it be destroyed. Why? Because no matter how strong a person may be in the truth, if he feeds his mind on the perverted ideas found in such literature, his mind and heart will be affected. A lingering wrong desire planted in the recesses of the heart can eventually create a perverted sexual appetite. The result? James says that when wrong desire becomes fertile, it gives birth to sin, and sin leads to death. (James 1:15) So why start the chain reaction?

¹² Well, if we would act so decisively to protect our children from exposure to pornography, should we not expect that our loving heavenly Father would similarly warn us and protect us from spiritual fornication, including apostasy? He says, Keep away from it!

As can be observed, "apostate literature" is equated with pornography.  Let's see how Andre's story would read with such an equation inserted:

 Andre ́ , who had served Jehovah for years, had the bitter experience of being led astray by [pornography]. He felt that having a quick look at [pornography] would not be dangerous. He recalls: “Initially, I was attracted to the so-called truths that the [porn industry] spoke of. The more I examined what they said, the more I came to think that I was justified in leaving Jehovah’s organization. But later, as I did some research on [pornography], I became aware of how crafty the false teachers were. Information taken out of context was their ‘strong evidence’ against us. Thus, I decided to start reading our publications again and to attend the meetings. Soon I realized how much I had missed.” Happily, Andre ́ returned to the congregation. -p. 19 

Most should be able to see how silly such an equation really is.  But if apostate literature is as bad as pornography, then why even "do the research?"  No one has to research pornography to know that is is grossly unbiblical.  Moreover, many secularists are aware of the harmful effects of pornography as well.  However, if apostate literature is what the Society claims, then there is no need to investigate.  It should be dismissed out of hand without a single glance.

What I can't seem to figure out is why the Society continues to suppress any attempt to deal with this so-called "apostate literature."  Here, it seems as though the WT is commending Andre for checking the facts.  Are they seriously suggesting that by researching WT literature, such an honest investigation will lead to finding answers to apostate claims?  It would seem so.  But one will be hard-pressed to find answers to the claims made by former Governing Body member Ray Franz in his book, CRISIS OF CONSCIENCE or that of Carl O. Jonsson's in his book, THE GENTILE TIMES RECONSIDERED by researching WT literature.

One of the reasons why so many JW's leave the organization is because of books like these; books that the WT has failed to make mention of or dealt with the arguments therein.  Instead, they have told JW's to avoid these books as if they were pornography, yet they are to examine its claims on their own when they find themselves trapped in "apostate thinking."  Yes, please do your own research, like Andre, and examine the claims made by Franz and Jonsson.