Thursday, July 05, 2007

Jehovah's Witnesses, the soul, and Revelation 6:9-11

This past Tuesday I went to the Jehovah's Witnesses book study that I regularly attend at the local Kingdom Hall. If you are unfamiliar with Jehovah's Witnesses, every Kingdom Hall (thats the name of their churches) does the same book studies, same sermons, same hymns, etc. In other words, every Kingdom Hall book study all over the world is currently studying the book of revelation. In fact, as far as I know, every Kingdom Hall all over the world is currently finishing up chapter 17 of the Watchtower publication, Revelation; Its Grand Climax at Hand!

But that's not what I intend to discuss here. I want to discuss the Jehovah's Witnesses' interpretation of Revelation 6:9-11 in light of their belief that man has no immaterial "soul" that is separate from the body. Yes, you heard correctly; they don't believe that men have souls. Well, ok, they believe that men have "souls" but in the sense that man is a soul. In other words, to the JW, the "soul" is the same thing as the "body." When the body dies, the soul dies. Make sense? Great. Let's continue.

When the Lamb broke the fifth seal, I saw underneath the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of God, and because of the testimony which they had maintained; and they cried out with a loud voice, saying, "How long, O Lord, holy and true, will You refrain from judging and avenging our blood on those who dwell on the earth?" And there was given to each of them a white robe; and they were told that they should rest for a little while longer, until the number of their fellow servants and their brethren who were to be killed even as they had been, would be completed also. (Revelation 6:9-11)

You might be asking yourself, "Mike, what does this verse have to do with the JW's belief about the soul?" First, look at verse 6. It speaks of "souls who had been slain." Now, let's be fair to the JW; just because the word "soul" is used doesn't necessarily mean that it is an entity that is separate from the body. It just means that the word needs to be analyzed in light of its context.

I'll agree that if we isolate this verse, it would be difficult to defend either position. But I do have a question for the JW; how did these "souls" get into heaven? Were they resurrected spiritually or physically? To the reader, understand that JW's don't believe that there are physical bodies in heaven; all heavenly beings are spiritual and immaterial. So the only consistent way for the JW to understand this verse is that, whatever is in heaven, it is dead. In other words, when someone dies, they are dead. The "soul" doesn't live on.

But the real problem comes when we get to verse 10, "they cried out." Do dead men "cry out?" Metaphorically, you could say so. Read the explanation given in the Watchtower publication referenced earlier,

How can their souls, or blood, cry out for vengeance, since the Bible shows that the dead are unconscious? (Ecclesiastes 9:5) Well, did not righteous Abel's blood cry out after Cain murdered him? Jehovah then said to Cain: "What have you done? Listen! Your brother's blood is crying out to me from the ground." (Genesis 4:10, 11; Hebrews 12:24) It was not that Abel's blood was literally uttering words. Rather, Abel had died as an innocent victim, and justice called out for his murder to be punished. Similarly, those Christian martyrs are innocent, and in justice they must be avenged. (Luke 18:7, 8) The cry for vengeance is loud because many thousands have thus died.--Compare Jeremiah 15:15, 16. (Revelation; Its Grand Climax at Hand! pg. 101)

At the face of it, this argument seems to be a sufficient explanation if we left it there. But like all Bible verses, there are more that follow (except for the end of each book). Verse 10 follows with not just a mere "crying out"; there are actual words that are uttered, "How long, O Lord, holy and true, will You refrain from judging and avenging our blood on those who dwell on the earth?" Can such a thing be likened to Abel's blood that "cried out"? Did Abel's blood utter any words? Of course not. But this situation is completely different. Not only do these souls cry out, but it says that they cried out with "a loud voice." And when someone cries out with a loud voice, what always follows: sound. But not just sound in this case, but a full sentence. I don't know how much more clear this could be. These are the souls of those who had been slain; souls that are a separate entity from the body.

But it doesn't stop there. Check out verse 11. These souls were given robs, were told that they should rest for a little while longer (referencing the future resurrection) until their brethren had been killed also. So why would robes be given to dead, immaterial souls and be told that they should continue resting until their brethren had been killed? Ok, i'll grant that there probably are instances where dead men are spoken to who can't hear (can you give me any examples?), but which position is more consistence in light of these verses?

I hope my argument makes sense. And I also hope that I have correctly represented the Jehovah's Witness position. If I haven't, please correct me and explain your position in light of these verses.


Anonymous said...


I don't know if you receive messages regarding comments. I found your posting via Google, since I was looking for JW and interpretation with Revelation...

My wife and I have been doing an in-home Bible study with some JW's, and I have to say that I don't understand their interpretation, based not only on this, but, further, how do they explain the 'transfiguration' and the appearance of Moses and Elijah, or the appearance of Jesus to the disciples in a locked room. Did he open the door? No, the verses indicate that, despite the locked doors, he "appeared" in front of them... sounds rather spirit-like to me.

Looks like just another case of another group of people saying "we have the only RIGHT interpretation of 'scripture'...and then reading both so much into and out of it that it should become clear to a rational observer that they are just as messed up as any other 'fundamentalist' group. *sigh*.


Mike-e said...

Thanks for your comment, RT. I, too, have been involved in personal Bible studies with JW's for over a year now. But my purpose is to share with them the Gospel.

If you are unfamiliar with JW's, they are very good at sounding "biblical," but you will notice that the studies are always accompanied by WT literature.

I'm not saying that you shouldn't study with them. But I am saying that if your motives are for finding the truth, then please consider giving an open hearing to the other side as well. I know things about the WT that almost no JW's know about. The organization is corrupt and has been guilty of falsely prophecying many times in the past.

Anyways, I would be very interested in discussing these issues with you. Please feel free to email me at and i'll give you my take on any questions that you may have.

Anonymous said...


Thanks, I am aware (as are the people I'm studying with) that the JW's have had to 'change their story' when prophecies have not come true. Still, they want to stick to minor variations on the theme, rather than do what they would actually need to, which is start over from scratch.

Way back when I nearly got sucked in by a cult called the 'whereveryouwer Church of Christ' in New York Church of Christ, etc. They used high pressure fear tactics to attempt to draft 'disciples' then haranguement and other tactics to attempt to keep you in. I quickly realized these were not the folk for me.

I also happen to have been a Catholic (can't actually say that now) but I have a wonderfully annotated copy of the Jerusalem Bible from the time, including a notation as to the compilers, who included one JRR Tolkien. The tricky part will be informing my wife that they teach a very naieve and simplistic view of the scriptures, especially including authorship, denial of 'conflicts' in the scriptures, etc., and that what they say 'the Bible teaches' isn't necessarily so...not that I quite understand the imperative emphasis on the Bible, anyway...the Koran essentially also claims inviolable inerrancy as God-inspired teachings, too...

Take the best, and leave the rest, I say.

Mike-e said...

Thanks for your comment, but i'm not really sure what you're getting at.

Anonymous said...

My name is Frank Lacourse I was browsing internet and found your blog. The author did a great job. I will subscribe to your RSS feeds. Thank you for your contribution. I am a web designer myself. And here some examples of the websites that I designed for payday loans canadian payday loans company.

Anonymous said...

Aloha! Carolyn Cote . payday loans

Anonymous said...

toronto loans This website is the correct I enjoyed it quite a bit
AAA Toronto Payday Loans 1172 Bay St #101, Toronto, ON M5S 2B4 (416) 477-2817

Anonymous said...

facebook layouts
Free Facebook Graphics

Anonymous said...

I'm not JW but I believe they are right concerning this topic. Below are some scriptures that say the dead cannot cry out:
Eccl 9:5 Dead know nothing
Eccl 9:10 There is no knowledge in the grave
Ps 146:4 Thoughts perish at death
Ps 6:5 no rememberance of God in the grave.
John 3:13 no man has ascended to heaven but He who came down from heaven.

Ecll 12:7 the spirit in man returns to God but obviously from the above scripture there is no consciousness in the spirit itself.

Heb 11 lists several heros of faith yet even though they obtain good testimony they did not recieve the promise yet. They won't be made perfect apart from others to come (Heb11:39-40).
Eternal life is a gift of God (Rom 6:23) but some claim we already have eternal life (an immortal soul). Ezek 18:4,20 show that a soul that sins will die.
All of 1 Cor 15 is about resurrection but it occurs at the "last trump"
1 Cor 15:52 At the last trump the dead are raised incorruptible
1 Thess 4:15-18 The last trumpet also announces Christs return. That is when the dead in Christ rise from the graves and meet Christ in the clouds.
Matt 24:21 Angels gather the elect when trumpet is sounded.
Reve 20:4-6 Resurrection of the dead in Christ (the second death has no power - truly they attain eternal life). The rest of the dead do not live again until the thousand years are finished.

Here is a link to article on Lazurus and the Rich Man

The Apologetic Front said...

Anonymous, thanks for your comment, but perhaps you can share your interpretation of this text in Revelation 6?